ITEM CA7 - APPENDIX
A
Eco-towns: Living a Greener
Future
Joint report by Cherwell
District Council and Oxfordshire County Council.
OXFORDSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL / CHERWELL DISTRICT COUNCIL
JOINT TECHNICAL NOTE
WESTON OTMOOR ECO-TOWN PROPOSAL
1 Introduction
1.1 DCLG
published Eco-Towns: Living a Greener Future on 3 April for consultation; this
period concludes on 30 June. This document provides an explanation
of the key principles of the proposed settlements, an outline of the process
for the assessment of candidate sites and a shortlist of 15 locations. Further technical assessments are
ongoing to enable the publication of a draft Eco-Towns PPS in July. The wider technical assessment of the
shortlisted proposals will continue until late September prior to the
identification of up to 10 preferred locations within the final PPS in October.
2 Assessment
of the Proposal
2.1 To
provide views on the Weston Otmoor proposal; its location, the approach to the
development, infrastructure requirements, the technologies involved and the
likely impacts of the proposal.
2.2 The
views of each Council will need to be considered and endorsed by the Cabinet in
the case of OCC and the Executive in the case of CDC in advance of the end of
the consultation period. This
provides a very short time window in which to identify issues and to undertake
appropriate technical background work.
The key dates are as follows:
OCC
Cabinet – 24th June
CDC
Executive – 7th July
2.3 The
consultation closing date of 30th June consultation will be a
difficult one to meet as there has been little opportunity for the pre-planning
of resources both inside and outside the two authorities. There is a need to establish what
resources (financial or otherwise) will be made available to the councils to
pay for this significant technical work.
2.4 The
table below provides a summary of the background technical work thought to be
required to aid DCLG, OCC and CDC in their assessment of the Weston Otmoor
proposal.
|
Transport |
|
|
|
Method of Assessment |
|
Transport Assessment The transport impacts to be
assessed will be set out in the specification to be provided by OCC. It is unlikely that it will be
possible to do a full TA in the time available. Need to ensure TA work is
integrated with work specified by Highways Agency. The assessment of the TA will need to cover the
following general issues but because of the nature of the proposal there are
likely to be other issues that will also need to be addressed.: Particular attention will need to be
paid to proposed technologies; management, delivery and enforcement of the
proposals; and risks relating to these issues.
|
Parkridge to fund preparation of Transport
Assessment with OCC providing a lead on its specification. |
|
Planning |
|
|
Environmental
Constraints Assessment of impacts upon:
|
CDC/OCC with assistance from outside agencies. |
|
Drainage, Flooding and
Water Resources Assessment of current flood
risk and preparation of Flood Risk Assessment. An initial discussion with prospective consultants has
revealed that an SFRA based approach is unlikely to be sufficient to meet the
Environment AgencyÕs requirements.
The recommended approach would involve the preparation of a Water
Cycle Study (WCS); however, the consultant has advised that it would be
difficult to produce such a study within the current consultation timetable. |
Consultants required to
undertake this aspect with CDC input.
General issues could be addressed by CDC, but there is a need for
additional resources for this aspect. |
|
Housing Numbers To assess overall impacts
of revised housing numbers upon the LDF and the CouncilÕs housing strategy. |
CDC with input from DCLG
and GOSE. |
|
Impact upon Settlement
Patterns To assess the exiting
settlement pattern and the potential impacts of the proposal upon this. |
CDC |
|
Design Issues To review information and
comment upon the proposals. |
CDC |
|
Landscape Character An assessment of impacts
upon the wider landscape to consider the sensitivity of the wider landscape to
change and impacts likely to arise from the proposal. |
CDC, potential for
involvement of Consultants. |
|
Economic Impacts To assess the potential
negative and positive economic benefits that might arise from the
proposal. Particular regard
should be had to potential impacts upon Bicester and the CouncilsÕ strategy
to reduce levels of out-commuting and to improve the quality and quantity of
employment opportunities within the town. |
DCLG/Consultants with input
from OCC/CDC. |
|
Social Impacts To consider the potential
social impacts upon adjacent settlements, particularly Bicester and nearby
villages, but .a proposal of this scale may also have significant effects
upon Banbury (and other settlements beyond Cherwell District). |
DCLG/Consultants with input
from OCC/CDC. |
|
General Infrastructure To assess the overall level
of infrastructure and supporting facilities to be provided. An early initial assessment
of other large settlements has indicated that the proposed site area does not
appear sufficient to accommodate the intended land uses range of facilities
required. |
DCLG to examine within the
wider technical assessment, but CDC/OCC will be expected to contribute to
this process. |
|
Land Ownership To establish the pattern of
land ownership and extent of existing options. |
DCLG to examine within the
wider technical assessment, but CDC will be expected to contribute to this
process. |
|
Assessment of Site
against Eco-Town Criteria To assess the
characteristics of the site against DCLGÕs published requirements and to
compare the characteristics of Weston Otmoor against other candidate
locations. |
DCLG to examine within the
wider technical assessment, but CDC/OCC also to carry out their own appraisal
of the proposal. |
|
Potential for Future
Growth To consider future growth
potential and the role of Eco-Towns in the future. |
DCLG/CDC/OCC |
|
Overall Viability To assess the overall
financial viability of the proposal to compare the value to be secured
through the proposed development with the likely cost of the proposed
infrastructure. |
DCLG |
|
Community Engagement To consider how the
affected communities surrounding the proposal can be effectively engaged. |
Parkridge/CDC/OCC
supplemented by DCLG if necessary |
|
Phasing and Timescales To assess the projected
delivery of housing and its links to associated infrastructure. This relates to issues within the
development, but also to the resources available to outside agencies that
would be responsible for other areas of infrastructure. |
DCLG |
|
Assessment of Environmental
Credentials To assess the stated
environmental benefits of the proposal; in terms of green technology, carbon
saving, etc. |
Eco-Towns Challenge
Panel. Assessment of information
provided by Parkridge with contribution from CDC/OCC. |
|
Sustainability Appraisal |
|
|
To respond to the
publication of the Sustainability Appraisal when published in July. |
CDC/OCC/Consultants |
|
Planning Policy Statement |
|
|
To respond to the
consultation stage of the draft PPS.
There is a need to ensure that all relevant policy aspects and
technical requirements are dealt with in the PPS. The consultation timetable is currently unclear, but a
draft is expected to be published in July with a final document in
October/November. |
OCC/CDC |
|
Co-ordinate Publicity |
|
|
Need to ensure that the
CouncilsÕ positions are clearly communicated. Need clear coordination of PR strategy and lead person to
deal with press/media. It should
be noted that the CouncilsÕ views on the Eco-Town proposal is separate from
the CouncilsÕ support for East West Rail. Ensure all partners agree
and abide by media stance. DCLG has confirmed that all
Parkridge information should be made available for assessment, with the
exception of sensitive commercial and financial information. |
OCC/CDC |
|
Alternative Funding |
|
|
There will be significant
additional costs to the Councils in assessing the implications of the
Eco-Town proposal. This is
likely to be a need to employ additional staff resources or to employ
external consultants. Advice has
been sought from DCLG on the likely availability of additional resources. |
DCLG |
|
Other Issues |
|
|
The proposal would have
significant effects upon the progression of the current transport and land
studies being undertaken as part of the evidence base for the Cherwell
LDF. An initial meeting was held
on 30th April with CDC and OCC officers and Halcrow (the
consultant) to discuss approach.
A strategic direction needed on whether we should assume this goes
ahead and build it into ITS/Central Oxfordshire work. |
CDC/OCC/Consultants |